(no subject)
хмм, хотел вспомнить старое название Трондхайма, почему то вылезло слово Nimrod,
заместo Nidaros,
однако это несколько иной смысл, ага.
заместo Nidaros,
однако это несколько иной смысл, ага.
2014-01-08
(no subject)
Кстати в Меланхолии пожалуй хозяин замка и есть Нимрод (учитывая что актер обычно играет в боевиках %-)))
т.е. он наблюдает небо и сначала чувствует себя в безопасности, потом просекает и умирает у ног коня Авраама, который вдруг успокаивается
"A portent in the stars tells Nimrod and his astrologers of the impending birth of Abraham, who would put an end to idolatry. Nimrod therefore orders the killing of all newborn babies. However, Abraham's mother escapes into the fields and gives birth secretly. At a young age, Abraham recognizes God and starts worshiping Him. He confronts Nimrod and tells him face-to-face to cease his idolatry, whereupon Nimrod orders him burned at the stake. In some versions, Nimrod has his subjects gather wood for four whole years, so as to burn Abraham in the biggest bonfire the world had ever seen. Yet when the fire is lit, Abraham walks out unscathed."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nimrod
т.е. фильм про авраамову жертву с неким подсценарием Авраам vs Нимрод.
т.е. он наблюдает небо и сначала чувствует себя в безопасности, потом просекает и умирает у ног коня Авраама, который вдруг успокаивается
"A portent in the stars tells Nimrod and his astrologers of the impending birth of Abraham, who would put an end to idolatry. Nimrod therefore orders the killing of all newborn babies. However, Abraham's mother escapes into the fields and gives birth secretly. At a young age, Abraham recognizes God and starts worshiping Him. He confronts Nimrod and tells him face-to-face to cease his idolatry, whereupon Nimrod orders him burned at the stake. In some versions, Nimrod has his subjects gather wood for four whole years, so as to burn Abraham in the biggest bonfire the world had ever seen. Yet when the fire is lit, Abraham walks out unscathed."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nimrod
т.е. фильм про авраамову жертву с неким подсценарием Авраам vs Нимрод.
(no subject)
It was like waking from a dream: my producer showed me a
suggestion for a poster. “What is that?” I ask. ”It’s a film you’ve
made!” she replies. ”I hope not,” I stammer. Trailers are shown
... stills ... it looks like shit. I’m shaken.
Don’t get me wrong ... I’ve worked on the film for two years. With
great pleasure. But perhaps I’ve deceived myself. Let myself be
tempted. Not that anyone has done anything wrong ... on the
contrary, everybody has worked loyally and with talent toward
the goal defined by me alone. But when my producer presents
me with the cold facts, a shiver runs down my spine.
This is cream on cream. A woman’s film! I feel ready to reject the
film like a wrongly transplanted organ.
But what was it I wanted? With a state of mind as my starting
point, I desired to dive headlong into the abyss of German
romanticism. Wagner in spades. That much I know. But is that
not just another way of expressing defeat? Defeat to the lowest
of cinematic common denominators? Romance is abused in all
sorts of endlessly dull ways in mainstream products.
And then, I must admit, I have had happy love relationships with
romantic cinema ... to name the obvious: Visconti!
German romance that leaves you breathless. But in Visconti,
there was always something to elevate matters beyond the trivial
... elevate it to masterpieces!
I am confused now and feel guilty. What have I done?
Is it ’exit Trier?’ I cling to the hope that there may be a bone
splinter amid all the cream that may, after all, crack a fragile
tooth ... I close my eyes and hope!
Lars von Trier, Copenhagen, April 13, 2011.
http://www.festival-cannes.com/assets/Image/Direct/042199.pdf
suggestion for a poster. “What is that?” I ask. ”It’s a film you’ve
made!” she replies. ”I hope not,” I stammer. Trailers are shown
... stills ... it looks like shit. I’m shaken.
Don’t get me wrong ... I’ve worked on the film for two years. With
great pleasure. But perhaps I’ve deceived myself. Let myself be
tempted. Not that anyone has done anything wrong ... on the
contrary, everybody has worked loyally and with talent toward
the goal defined by me alone. But when my producer presents
me with the cold facts, a shiver runs down my spine.
This is cream on cream. A woman’s film! I feel ready to reject the
film like a wrongly transplanted organ.
But what was it I wanted? With a state of mind as my starting
point, I desired to dive headlong into the abyss of German
romanticism. Wagner in spades. That much I know. But is that
not just another way of expressing defeat? Defeat to the lowest
of cinematic common denominators? Romance is abused in all
sorts of endlessly dull ways in mainstream products.
And then, I must admit, I have had happy love relationships with
romantic cinema ... to name the obvious: Visconti!
German romance that leaves you breathless. But in Visconti,
there was always something to elevate matters beyond the trivial
... elevate it to masterpieces!
I am confused now and feel guilty. What have I done?
Is it ’exit Trier?’ I cling to the hope that there may be a bone
splinter amid all the cream that may, after all, crack a fragile
tooth ... I close my eyes and hope!
Lars von Trier, Copenhagen, April 13, 2011.
http://www.festival-cannes.com/assets/Image/Direct/042199.pdf
(no subject)
забавно:
"Zappa was important to me because I realised I didn't have to make music like he did. I might have made a lot of music like he did if he had not done it first and made me realise that I did not want to go there. I did not like his music but I am grateful that he did it. Sometimes you learn as much from the things you don't like as from the things you do like. The rejection side is as important as the endorsement part. You define who you are and where you are by the things that you know you are not. Sometimes that's all the information you have to go on. I'm not that kind of person. You don't quite know where you are but you find yourself in the space left behind by the things you've rejected."
http://www.theguardian.com/music/2010/jan/17/brian-eno-interview-paul-morley
"Zappa was important to me because I realised I didn't have to make music like he did. I might have made a lot of music like he did if he had not done it first and made me realise that I did not want to go there. I did not like his music but I am grateful that he did it. Sometimes you learn as much from the things you don't like as from the things you do like. The rejection side is as important as the endorsement part. You define who you are and where you are by the things that you know you are not. Sometimes that's all the information you have to go on. I'm not that kind of person. You don't quite know where you are but you find yourself in the space left behind by the things you've rejected."
http://www.theguardian.com/music/2010/jan/17/brian-eno-interview-paul-morley
(no subject)
ну, сериал Шерлок кажется следует такой схеме мироздания:
есть олимпийские боги-геи, которые играют в политику и они вне морали, таков Мориарти и Майкрофт,
есть гей-прометей, этакий падший ангел, Шерлок, чужой для всех, совмещет природу гея и человека
ну а остальные гетерообыватели, типа Ватсона.
Мориарти конечно победил Шерлока, символически сбросив его с Олимпа, обнаружив что природа Шерлока загрязнена, не чисто гейская.
То что Шерлок тем не менее жив, есть следствие магии Майкрофта, его олимпийского покровителя, но а как боги действуют и не показали, смертного гетеросексуала не стоит посвящать в гейские ритуалы, а Шерлок хоть и падший но все равно немного свой.
есть олимпийские боги-геи, которые играют в политику и они вне морали, таков Мориарти и Майкрофт,
есть гей-прометей, этакий падший ангел, Шерлок, чужой для всех, совмещет природу гея и человека
ну а остальные гетерообыватели, типа Ватсона.
Мориарти конечно победил Шерлока, символически сбросив его с Олимпа, обнаружив что природа Шерлока загрязнена, не чисто гейская.
То что Шерлок тем не менее жив, есть следствие магии Майкрофта, его олимпийского покровителя, но а как боги действуют и не показали, смертного гетеросексуала не стоит посвящать в гейские ритуалы, а Шерлок хоть и падший но все равно немного свой.