(no subject)
Oct. 26th, 2012 04:12 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
aleatoriusпосмотрел впервые (еще не до конца, досмотрю попозже) про Амели Курочкину,
сразу обратил внимание что Монмарт там совсем фрaнцузкий и белый,
глянул в инете - не я один отметил, вот к примеру:
"Amélie presents a white-washed version of 1997 Montmartre, (nearly) completely devoid of racial or ethnic diversity. That is bad enough. The astonishing popularity of the movie, along with the willingness of critics to denounce those who make hay over the racial issues, act as a set of indicators that should trouble far more than they seem to, because they indict groups who should know better (the sensitive, “intellectual” art-house crowd that fueled the movie’s popularity in the US and the French population that made it a super-blockbuster there). That they didn’t know better suggests that the movie works on a covertly racist narrative like the one in the Jetsons joke, and, because of that, should be investigated further."
сразу обратил внимание что Монмарт там совсем фрaнцузкий и белый,
глянул в инете - не я один отметил, вот к примеру:
"Amélie presents a white-washed version of 1997 Montmartre, (nearly) completely devoid of racial or ethnic diversity. That is bad enough. The astonishing popularity of the movie, along with the willingness of critics to denounce those who make hay over the racial issues, act as a set of indicators that should trouble far more than they seem to, because they indict groups who should know better (the sensitive, “intellectual” art-house crowd that fueled the movie’s popularity in the US and the French population that made it a super-blockbuster there). That they didn’t know better suggests that the movie works on a covertly racist narrative like the one in the Jetsons joke, and, because of that, should be investigated further."
